NQ: Previous-day high or low

Sweep-and-reject at yesterday's high or low. Backtested on real CME NQ 1-minute bars.

Short answer

We backtested the Previous-day high or low on NQ (Nasdaq-100 futures (NQ and MNQ)) using real CME 1-minute bars from 2 Jan 2023 to 18 Oct 2026. It took 528 trades, won 31.6% of them and made -$8,148 after costs, an average of -0.07R per trade. It did not clear the bar: it failed 6 of 8 tests, including "Average R of +0.10 or more". Against a random-walk copy of the same data it scored 0.03R worse, so there is no clear edge over chance. It trades 18:00 to 21:30 IST in summer or 19:00 to 22:30 IST in winter (08:30 to 12:00 New York time).

Strategy setup

Times in your time zone: EST (America/New York), New York times beside them. Change it in your profile.

Real days from the data

08:0008:00 New York09:0009:00 New York10:0010:00 New York11:0011:00 New York12:0012:00 New Yorkpd_low 29,424.75Time exit limitStop29,418.00Target29,550.00Buy 29,462.00Target hit+2.00R · +$175

Wed, 9 Sept 2026, long. In at 09:31 EST (09:31 New York), out at 09:58 EST (09:58 New York). 5-minute candles, 1 MNQ, $88 at risk.

Levels
Yesterday's high and low08:30 to 12:00 EST (08:30 to 12:00 New York)
Setup
Price trades at least a tick beyond a level it had not passed, then a bar closes back inside within 15 minutes
Entry
Market order at the open of the next bar
Stop
One tick beyond the sweep's extreme
Target
2R, twice the distance to the stop
Time exit
Flat by this time at the latest12:00 EST (12:00 New York)
Size
Whole MNQ micros, so the stop risks at most $150 (maximum 10). Skipped if one micro would risk more
Frequency
One trade a day

One tick lost on stop and market fills, a target needs price to trade a tick through it, the stop counts first when one bar touches both, and a target can't be hit in the bar a limit order fills. Commission is a placeholder $0.50 per micro per side, not Tradeify's actual rate.

Does it clear the bar?

Doesn't meet the bar

Fixed before any strategy was run. Every check must hold after costs. Average R is -0.07 against -0.04 on random-walk copies of the same days (±0.03): no better than chance.

  • At least 300 trades528
  • Average R of +0.10 or more-0.07
  • t-statistic of 3 or more-1.2
  • Beats a random walk by 0.10R-0.04R over -0.04R
  • Profitable in 3 of 4 years1 of 4
  • Positive out-of-sample (2025 on)+0.04R
  • Profit factor of 1.2 or more0.83
  • Max drawdown within $1,000-$10,274

Net profit

-$8,148

after $3,082 costs

Trades

528

on 53.8% of days

Win rate

31.6%

avg win $237, avg loss -$132

Average R

-0.07

95% range -0.19 to +0.04

Profit factor

0.83

expectancy -$15 a trade

Max drawdown

-$10,274

vs $1,000 allowed on a $25K account

Equity curve

Running net profit, by quarter

-$10,000-$9,000-$8,000-$7,000-$6,000-$5,000-$4,000-$3,000-$2,000-$1,000$023Q123Q1: -$1,24123Q2: -$1,57623Q323Q3: -$3,49223Q4: -$5,76224Q124Q1: -$8,19724Q2: -$9,07824Q324Q3: -$8,61824Q4: -$7,44725Q125Q1: -$7,86225Q2: -$7,14025Q325Q3: -$6,66525Q4: -$6,19626Q126Q1: -$6,81726Q2: -$7,58726Q326Q3: -$7,72426Q4: -$8,148

By year

Net profit, and trades taken

-$5,7622023149 trades-$1,6852024139 trades$1,2502025132 trades-$1,9512026108 trades

How trades ended

Net profit by exit type

-$47,764Stop360 trades, -1.03R$39,448Target165 trades, +2.00R$168Time exit3 trades, +0.48R

Days with a trade

Share of each year's trading days on which the strategy traded, and why the other days had no trade.

  • 2023
    58%
  • 2024
    54%
  • 2025
    51%
  • 2026
    52%
Reason for no tradeDaysShare of all days
no setup in the window42743.5%
one micro risks more than the budget191.9%
stop too tight to trade60.6%
no levels for the day10.1%
no bars in the window10.1%

Breakdowns

Nothing is tuned on the out-of-sample years: 2023 to 2024 is the in-sample period, 2025 on is out-of-sample.

PeriodTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
In-sample 2023 to 202428828.5%-$7,447-0.170.72-$10,274
Out-of-sample 2025 to Oct 202624035.4%-$700+0.040.97-$2,458
By yearTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
202314924.2%-$5,762-0.290.60-$6,083
202413933.1%-$1,685-0.030.87-$4,398
202513238.6%$1,250+0.131.12-$1,412
202610831.5%-$1,951-0.070.81-$2,458
By sideTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
Long21528.8%-$5,438-0.160.73-$5,821
Short31333.5%-$2,710-0.010.90-$5,648

Rule variations

Small changes to the rules, to check the result is not fragile. They are never used to choose the rules.

VariationTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdownDays skipped
Primary rules52831.6%-$8,148-0.070.83-$10,274-
Target 1R52842.8%-$12,603-0.160.68-$12,681454
Target 1.5R52835.6%-$11,268-0.130.75-$11,467454
Target 3R52824.4%-$8,428-0.080.84-$12,292454
Confirm in 5 min53230.3%-$11,358-0.110.77-$11,734450
Confirm in 30 min52032.7%-$6,370-0.050.86-$9,903462
Break and retest48827.5%-$13,381-0.200.70-$13,886494
Risk budget $25054232.1%-$6,486-0.070.91-$13,375440

Tradeify $25K evaluation

Target $1,500, trailing drawdown $1,000, daily loss $600. An attempt starts on each of 982 trading days in turn.

  • Passed 182
  • Failed on drawdown 781
  • Unfinished 19

18.9% of finished attempts passed, in a median of 71 trading days. Attempts that start on consecutive days overlap, and with no edge a simulated evaluation passes or fails mostly by luck.

Hypothetical results from a backtest on CME NQ futures, 2 Jan 2023 to 18 Oct 2026, run 19 October 2026. 104 strategies and variations were tried across the Strategy section, so the best few would look good by chance. Past performance does not predict future results, fills and costs are assumed, and an average of -0.07R with a 95% range of -0.19 to +0.04R can't be told apart from zero. Education, not trading advice.

More strategies

Trading a prop firm account?

Track each challenge's rules and today's dollar limits, with your sessions in your time zone. Free.

Create free account