GC: Previous-day high or low

Sweep-and-reject at yesterday's high or low. Backtested on real CME GC 1-minute bars.

Short answer

We backtested the Previous-day high or low on GC (gold futures (GC and MGC)) using real CME 1-minute bars from 2 Jan 2023 to 18 Oct 2026. It took 411 trades, won 33.1% of them and made -$6,584 after costs, an average of -0.07R per trade. It did not clear the bar: it failed 6 of 8 tests, including "Average R of +0.10 or more". Against a random-walk copy of the same data it scored 0.06R worse, so there is no clear edge over chance. It trades 17:50 to 21:30 IST in summer or 18:50 to 22:30 IST in winter (08:20 to 12:00 New York time).

Strategy setup

Times in your time zone: EST (America/New York), New York times beside them. Change it in your profile.

Real days from the data

08:0008:00 New York09:0009:00 New York10:0010:00 New York11:0011:00 New York12:0012:00 New Yorkpd_low 4,169.70Time exit limitStop4,168.80Target4,177.20Buy 4,171.60Target hit+2.00R · +$275

Wed, 14 Oct 2026, long. In at 08:22 EST (08:22 New York), out at 08:29 EST (08:29 New York). 5-minute candles, 5 MGC, $140 at risk.

Levels
Yesterday's high and low08:20 to 12:00 EST (08:20 to 12:00 New York)
Setup
Price trades at least a tick beyond a level it had not passed, then a bar closes back inside within 15 minutes
Entry
Market order at the open of the next bar
Stop
One tick beyond the sweep's extreme
Target
2R, twice the distance to the stop
Time exit
Flat by this time at the latest12:00 EST (12:00 New York)
Size
Whole MGC micros, so the stop risks at most $150 (maximum 10). Skipped if one micro would risk more
Frequency
One trade a day

One tick lost on stop and market fills, a target needs price to trade a tick through it, the stop counts first when one bar touches both, and a target can't be hit in the bar a limit order fills. Commission is a placeholder $0.50 per micro per side, not Tradeify's actual rate.

Does it clear the bar?

Doesn't meet the bar

Fixed before any strategy was run. Every check must hold after costs. Average R is -0.07 against -0.01 on random-walk copies of the same days (±0.04): no better than chance.

  • At least 300 trades411
  • Average R of +0.10 or more-0.07
  • t-statistic of 3 or more-1.0
  • Beats a random walk by 0.10R-0.06R over -0.01R
  • Profitable in 3 of 4 years1 of 4
  • Positive out-of-sample (2025 on)+0.06R
  • Profit factor of 1.2 or more0.83
  • Max drawdown within $1,000-$9,714

Net profit

-$6,584

after $2,410 costs

Trades

411

on 41.9% of days

Win rate

33.1%

avg win $233, avg loss -$139

Average R

-0.07

95% range -0.20 to +0.06

Profit factor

0.83

expectancy -$16 a trade

Max drawdown

-$9,714

vs $1,000 allowed on a $25K account

Equity curve

Running net profit, by quarter

-$10,000-$9,000-$8,000-$7,000-$6,000-$5,000-$4,000-$3,000-$2,000-$1,000$023Q123Q1: -$17523Q2: -$37823Q323Q3: -$2,56123Q4: -$2,19924Q124Q1: -$2,44524Q2: -$4,16824Q324Q3: -$5,45724Q4: -$6,07125Q125Q1: -$7,46625Q2: -$7,94125Q325Q3: -$9,25925Q4: -$7,63126Q126Q1: -$7,80326Q2: -$7,30426Q326Q3: -$7,13226Q4: -$6,584

By year

Net profit, and trades taken

-$2,1992023108 trades-$3,8722024115 trades-$1,5602025106 trades$1,047202682 trades

How trades ended

Net profit by exit type

-$38,081Stop268 trades, -1.05R$29,899Target120 trades, +2.00R$1,598Time exit23 trades, +0.62R

Days with a trade

Share of each year's trading days on which the strategy traded, and why the other days had no trade.

  • 2023
    42%
  • 2024
    44%
  • 2025
    41%
  • 2026
    40%
Reason for no tradeDaysShare of all days
no setup in the window50351.3%
stop too tight to trade484.9%
one micro risks more than the budget161.6%
no levels for the day10.1%
no bars in the window10.1%

Breakdowns

Nothing is tuned on the out-of-sample years: 2023 to 2024 is the in-sample period, 2025 on is out-of-sample.

PeriodTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
In-sample 2023 to 202422330.0%-$6,071-0.170.72-$6,365
Out-of-sample 2025 to Oct 202618836.7%-$513+0.060.97-$3,349
By yearTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
202310831.5%-$2,199-0.120.79-$2,855
202411528.7%-$3,872-0.220.65-$4,612
202510634.0%-$1,560-0.040.84-$3,349
20268240.2%$1,047+0.191.16-$1,127
By sideTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
Long18539.5%$1,349+0.121.09-$2,522
Short22627.9%-$7,933-0.220.65-$8,624

Rule variations

Small changes to the rules, to check the result is not fragile. They are never used to choose the rules.

VariationTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdownDays skipped
Primary rules41133.1%-$6,584-0.070.83-$9,714-
Target 1R41148.7%-$5,920-0.050.80-$7,486569
Target 1.5R41137.0%-$9,213-0.110.75-$11,029569
Target 3R41125.3%-$12,156-0.180.72-$12,644569
Confirm in 5 min40731.2%-$7,831-0.100.80-$10,507573
Confirm in 30 min41534.5%-$4,854-0.030.87-$8,393565
Break and retest31930.4%-$6,542-0.140.79-$7,042661
Risk budget $25042434.0%-$5,890-0.060.89-$12,574556

Tradeify $25K evaluation

Target $1,500, trailing drawdown $1,000, daily loss $600. An attempt starts on each of 980 trading days in turn.

  • Passed 83
  • Failed on drawdown 797
  • Unfinished 100

9.4% of finished attempts passed, in a median of 133 trading days. Attempts that start on consecutive days overlap, and with no edge a simulated evaluation passes or fails mostly by luck.

Hypothetical results from a backtest on CME GC futures, 2 Jan 2023 to 18 Oct 2026, run 19 October 2026. 104 strategies and variations were tried across the Strategy section, so the best few would look good by chance. Past performance does not predict future results, fills and costs are assumed, and an average of -0.07R with a 95% range of -0.20 to +0.06R can't be told apart from zero. Education, not trading advice.

More strategies

Trading a prop firm account?

Track each challenge's rules and today's dollar limits, with your sessions in your time zone. Free.

Create free account