GC: London breakout of the Asia range

Enter when price breaks the Asia high or low during London. Stop on the other side of the range. Backtested on real CME GC 1-minute bars.

Short answer

We backtested the London breakout of the Asia range on GC (gold futures (GC and MGC)) using real CME 1-minute bars from 2 Jan 2023 to 18 Oct 2026. It took 361 trades, won 44.6% of them and made -$1,309 after costs, an average of -0.01R per trade. It did not clear the bar: it failed 6 of 8 tests, including "Average R of +0.10 or more". Against a random-walk copy of the same data it scored 0.03R better, so there is no clear edge over chance. It trades 12:30 to 18:00 IST in summer or 13:30 to 19:00 IST in winter (03:00 to 08:30 New York time).

Strategy setup

Times in your time zone: EST (America/New York), New York times beside them. Change it in your profile.

Real days from the data

18:0018:00 New York21:0021:00 New York00:0000:00 New York03:0003:00 New York06:0006:00 New YorkRangeTime exit limitStop2,766.40Target2,742.70Sell 2,758.50Target hit+2.00R · +$157

Thu, 23 Jan 2025, short. In at 04:18 EST (04:18 New York), out at 08:26 EST (08:26 New York). 15-minute candles, 1 MGC, $79 at risk.

Range
The Asia session high and low18:00 to 03:00 EST (18:00 to 03:00 New York)
Entry
First break one tick beyond the range, stop order03:00 to 08:30 EST (03:00 to 08:30 New York)
Stop
Opposite side of the range
Target
2R, twice the distance to the stop
Time exit
Flat by this time at the latest08:30 EST (08:30 New York)
Size
Whole MGC micros, so the stop risks at most $150 (maximum 10). Skipped if one micro would risk more
Frequency
One trade a day

One tick lost on stop and market fills, a target needs price to trade a tick through it, the stop counts first when one bar touches both, and a target can't be hit in the bar a limit order fills. Commission is a placeholder $0.50 per micro per side, not Tradeify's actual rate.

Does it clear the bar?

Doesn't meet the bar

Fixed before any strategy was run. Every check must hold after costs. Average R is -0.01 against -0.04 on random-walk copies of the same days (±0.04): no better than chance.

  • At least 300 trades361
  • Average R of +0.10 or more-0.01
  • t-statistic of 3 or more-0.2
  • Beats a random walk by 0.10R+0.03R over -0.04R
  • Profitable in 3 of 4 years2 of 3
  • Positive out-of-sample (2025 on)+0.02R
  • Profit factor of 1.2 or more0.88
  • Max drawdown within $1,000-$2,698

Net profit

-$1,309

after $480 costs

Trades

361

on 36.8% of days

Win rate

44.6%

avg win $60, avg loss -$55

Average R

-0.01

95% range -0.08 to +0.06

Profit factor

0.88

expectancy -$4 a trade

Max drawdown

-$2,698

vs $1,000 allowed on a $25K account

Equity curve

Running net profit, by quarter

-$2,500-$2,000-$1,500-$1,000-$500$023Q123Q1: -$1,03223Q2: -$1,81523Q323Q3: -$2,16523Q4: -$2,20124Q124Q1: -$2,18024Q2: -$1,68424Q324Q3: -$1,40824Q4: -$1,36225Q125Q1: -$1,44725Q2: -$1,46125Q325Q3: -$1,309

By year

Net profit, and trades taken

-$2,2012023194 trades$8392024136 trades$53202531 trades

How trades ended

Net profit by exit type

-$5,975Stop49 trades, -1.01R$1,667Target8 trades, +2.00R$2,999Time exit304 trades, +0.10R

Days with a trade

Share of each year's trading days on which the strategy traded, and why the other days had no trade.

  • 2023
    75%
  • 2024
    53%
  • 2025
    12%
Reason for no tradeDaysShare of all days
one micro risks more than the budget41342.1%
no breakout before the time exit20520.9%
day ends inside the range10.1%

Breakdowns

Nothing is tuned on the out-of-sample years: 2023 to 2024 is the in-sample period, 2025 on is out-of-sample.

PeriodTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
In-sample 2023 to 202433045.5%-$1,362-0.010.86-$2,698
Out-of-sample 2025 to Oct 20263135.5%$53+0.021.05-$573
By yearTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
202319443.8%-$2,201-0.080.63-$2,518
202413647.8%$839+0.091.21-$845
20253135.5%$53+0.021.05-$573
By sideTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdown
Long19644.4%$380+0.041.07-$1,270
Short16544.8%-$1,689-0.070.71-$1,791

Rule variations

Small changes to the rules, to check the result is not fragile. They are never used to choose the rules.

VariationTradesWin rateNetAvg RProfit factorMax drawdownDays skipped
Primary rules36144.6%-$1,309-0.010.88-$2,698-
Target 1R36145.4%-$1,365-0.010.88-$2,673619
Target 1.5R36144.9%-$9650.000.91-$2,557619
Target 3R36144.6%-$1,258-0.010.89-$2,654619
Stop at the middle54543.1%-$5,732-0.060.81-$5,883435
Risk budget $25050746.9%-$1,794-0.010.92-$5,117473

Tradeify $25K evaluation

Target $1,500, trailing drawdown $1,000, daily loss $600. An attempt starts on each of 980 trading days in turn.

  • Passed 28
  • Failed on drawdown 110
  • Unfinished 842

20.3% of finished attempts passed, in a median of 223 trading days. Attempts that start on consecutive days overlap, and with no edge a simulated evaluation passes or fails mostly by luck.

Hypothetical results from a backtest on CME GC futures, 2 Jan 2023 to 18 Oct 2026, run 19 October 2026. 104 strategies and variations were tried across the Strategy section, so the best few would look good by chance. Past performance does not predict future results, fills and costs are assumed, and an average of -0.01R with a 95% range of -0.08 to +0.06R can't be told apart from zero. Education, not trading advice.

More strategies

Trading a prop firm account?

Track each challenge's rules and today's dollar limits, with your sessions in your time zone. Free.

Create free account